Wednesday, November 20, 2019

Is your underwear white today?


Black kosoku, or black school rules, are a common thing in Japanese middle and high schools. The “black” in the name is the same “black” used to describe black companies, which are companies that have no regard for their workers’ wellbeing. Similarly, many people view black kosoku as stripping students of their human rights. Some example of black kosoku rules include forcing female students to wear only white underwear and not allowing students to wear scarves, even when it is cold. For example, if schools were to enforce the former rule, that would require teachers to check students’ underwear, violating the privacy of the students.

Japanese schools have such stringent rules because of a “drastic increase in juvenile delinquency and violence against teachers in the early 1980s.” Limiting students’ freedoms seemed like the best way to curb delinquent behavior. For Japanese schools, orderliness in classrooms is important, and any individuality might cause disorderliness.

Many school boards are in the process of reviewing their kosoku and eliminating the rules that are the blackest. The boards of education of Gifu Prefecture, Osaka Prefecture, and Setagaya Ward in Tokyo have all made changes or have started making changes to their school rules.

Unlike previous news articles that we have read for class, the change that Japanese schools are going through is not caused by a new government policy or the desire to conform to the rest of the world so as not to be seen as “behind on the times”, but rather the movement is fueled by Japan’s own citizens. In a tweet by middle school teacher @barbeejill3, previously known for critiquing black kosoku, students in a school assembly hall are shown kneeling seiza style and bowing to their teachers while a teacher looking onward in the background stands over them. User @barbeejill3 was tipped off on this school policy by an anonymous high school student. One commenter remarks, “先生というのはどこか一般常識を超えてるところがある”, or “Some teachers are beyond common sense.” Another commenter notes that “あえて鵜呑みにするとして、礼儀作法を教えるなら教師は前に「立つ」のでなく同じ正座であるべきでは,” or, “If you to teach ceremonial manners, then teachers shouldn’t “stand” before (the kneeling students) but should be in the same position.” The netizens’ comments mostly critique the black kosoku, saying that this photo looks more like the students are prostrating themselves to the teachers.

Not only are students angry about black kosoku, but educators such as @barbeejill3, Professor Ryo Uchida of Nagoya University, and Yuji Aoki of the Setagaya Education Board are also disgusted by black kosoku and want to change them because of their personal beliefs. The black kosoku situation is much different from the bullying situation that we read about previously; this time, the teachers themselves are enacting change because they see the injustice, not because of policies passed by the national government.

Battle of the Pops


The world of entertainment is cutthroat. It evolves with the ever-transient tastes of the public. However, the game is high-risk high reward. With such popularity comes worldwide publicity and expansion— the visibility of culture to the rest of the world. The article speaks of the declining popularity of Japanese pop culture and its replacement with its Korean alternative.

There is a clear difference in approach between the two: a modern vs. traditional approach. The article insinuates certain complacency in the Japanese pop culture scene due to its established popularity. Contrarily, Korean groups are taking advantage of social media platforms, international advertisements, and other branding opportunities to imprint themselves on the overseas conscious. Even the fan base has followed this suit, creating dubbed versions of performances/other media for greater foreign exposure.

There was one part of the article that particularly caught my eye. In regards to companies using Korean pop culture icons for their brands that “cherry pick the  country’s entertainment industry when launching ad and marketing campaigns”. Companies are taking advantage of these industries to boost their own. Obviously, this importance of this article does not lie in fact that people are seeking new forms of entertainment. Rather, this shift results in economic consequences.  The goal of these media magnates is to capture the gaze of the Asian continent, as they are the largest consumer of media exports. Rates of consumption have steadily increased for the most part, and absolutely skyrocketed in the Greater China area. Korea is steadily reaching Japan’s broadcast export ($221 million vs $223 million), and will likely eclipse it in the coming years.

The article also gives interesting insight into shifting cultural values. The relationship between Japan and Korea is complex. Ebbing and flowing as the two try to reach mutual understanding. Some of the older generations of Japanese people carry trepidation when in comes to Korea. With the instillation of Korean media, the younger generation can usher in a new culture of acceptance. We have already seen instances of both parties trying to mend prior strife. For example, Abe Shinzo offering 1 billion yen in support of sexual assault victims during WWII.





Gimme that radioactive sushi!


After the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster in 2011, 54 countries imposed some sort of restriction on foods grown in the Japanese prefectures of Fukushima, Miyagi, and Ibaraki. In recent news (8 years later), countries like Singapore and Brunei have lifted their restrictions, such that only 21 countries’ restrictions remain. Although these are victories for Japan, Abe’s administration has its eyes set on the grand prize: Hong Kong and mainland China. These countries import one third of Japan’s food exports, so if they, too, lift their restrictions, the economies of the banned prefectures may be saved.

Will this goal come to fruition? Well, Japan and China’s relationship (which has always been a bit strained) is gradually improving. Lately, Xi Jinping lifted a ban on Japanese Niigata-grown rice, so perhaps China sees Japanese food with less disdain than they used to. The long-lasting historical rivalry is unlikely to vanish just because the Chinese want some tasty sushi, but it is a good sign that the two are willing to help each other out economically.

In my opinion, Japanese estimates for the future of their seafood industry seem a bit too optimistic. They had 900 billion yen of foreign exports in 2018, and hope to quintuple that to 5 trillion yen in 2030, based on a general increase in interest in Japanese cuisine. While may be true that more people want to try tempura and udon as of late, I find it hard to imagine that in 11 years, five times as many non-Japanese will eat Japanese cuisine compared to now.

In regards to the Fukushima power plant meltdown, this moment sends a signal to other countries about the ramifications of nuclear disaster. The majority of countries waited around eight years after such a disaster before feeling willing to buy their food again. Although this length of time will vary by the severity of the disaster, anything on the order of “eight years of a depressed economy” is likely to scare other countries into playing it safe. 

After 2011, we saw the international community suddenly become wary of Japan’s competence and nuclear power as a whole, with the The Economist reporting that the IAEA halved its estimates for nuclear power capability in 2035. Finally, eight years later, we’re starting to get a conclusion to this international backlash. Of course, the effects of the Fukushima accident have no conclusion, with certain areas never being safe for humans for thousands of years (I saw a TV show about Japanese robots built to navigate the destroyed power plant). However, this may be as close as we can get to a conclusion.

“Investors applaud mooted $27bn Yahoo Japan Line deal”

Tonight I’ll be going to practice with Wadaiko Uzu, a community taiko group based in the Uji area. This ensemble of 25 mostly elderly men and women communicates almost entirely via LINE, a messaging app that has become ubiquitous in Japanese society: among a population of 126 million people, 79 million people use LINE monthly and over 67 million use the app every day. These usage statistics are in fact so high that ceiling effects have stalled user growth, but they nonetheless represent a prime revenue opportunity.

In contrast with some messaging platforms such as WhatsApp, LINE is a well-monetized messaging platform. LINE makes its money in three primary categories, the largest being advertising (35%): celebrities and businesses can create LINE Official Accounts to send mass-messages to their followers, post to the LINE Timeline, create PR pages with coupons, and more (allowing LINE to take a cut of the advertising revenue). Companies can also create Sponsored Stickers for their brand mascots or put ads in LINE NEWS. LINE also allows users to buy sticker packs or create and sell their own LINE themes, and even has free-to-play video games with in-app purchases that allow users to progress through the game (many of which are developed in-house by LINE). Despite these monetization strategies, LINE’s flat user growth have contributed to a ¥33.9B net loss in the first three quarters of 2019.

The leading messaging app in Japan, Taiwan, and Thailand, LINE has a $10B market cap and is owned by South Korean search engine company Naver. Naver and Japanese mega-conglomerate holding company Softbank are drafting a $27B merger between Naver’s LINE and Softbank-owned Yahoo! Japan. Yahoo! Japan, originally formed as a joint venture between Yahoo! and Softbank but now wholly owned by Softbank subsidiary Z Holdings, offers Japan’s dominant search engine and is a leader in online advertising, e-commerce, financial services, and more.

In creating this new mega-company, LINE and Yahoo! Japan aim to learn from the success of WeChat in China by bundling their respective leading services into a potential super-app of their own. In the face of rising competition from tech giants in the US (Google, Facebook, Amazon, Apple) and China (Tencent, Huawei, Alibaba), the pair aim to reduce competition and take advantage of their current market positions to be a one-stop shop for Japanese users. Mobile payments is one key vertical that this could affect, with both LINE Pay and Softbank/Yahoo’s Pay Pay boasting tens of millions of users.

Softbank’s taken a string of losses recently, most notably with the collapse of WeWork, and the strong positive investor reaction to the proposed merger are sure to come as welcome news for Masayoshi Son and the rest of the Softbank team.


- Arjun Kumar

Supplementary Sources:


Tuesday, November 19, 2019

K-Pop takes over SE Asia, leaving J-Pop retreating back to Japan

K-Pop takes over SE Asia, leaving J-Pop retreating back to Japan


"J-pop goes flat as Southeast Asia swoons for Korean artists"

Written by Shotaro Tani, Nikkei Asian Review - November 11, 2019

Nolan Matcovich - November 20, 2019


Japanese pop idols have been increasing losing their popularity and influence in Southeast Asia due to the rise in popularity of South Korean idol groups. This article presents this decline and trade off from a number of perspectives, but I found that there were three main points that seemed more interesting and important to me. First, both in and out of Japan, J-Pop (in the context of this article, mainly referring to pop, but also more broadly to most Japanese music) groups have relied much more heavily on physical music sales, television appearances, and hyped-up live performances, among other things, to gain and maintain popularity with fans. All of these, however, have been available to music groups for multiple decades, and have increasingly paled in the face of the social media-heavy fan engagement tactics of K-Pop and the Korean music industry. Especially in order to connect with foreign fans, social media can be especially useful, given that television appearances and live performances overseas can be costly and logistically, not to mention the potential that social media has, as the article mentions, to provide foreign fans a connected series of platforms on which they can provide other fans with translations and create and share their own fan works.

Second, and somewhat related, the article referenced ways in which Moon Jae-in's government has been using the popularity of K-Pop in Southeast Asia to its advantage in striking business and political deals throughout the region as part of its New Southern Policy. Although I wasn't able to find much on this and the article didn't mention anything about previous or current similar efforts by the Japanese government, I would imagine that this has not been as big of a political playing card for Japan. I would imagine this is partly due to its colonial legacy in East Asia as well as its continued importance in the region over the last century and a half, in contrast to Korea's role as the Asian underdog that it is only now beginning to shed as a result of its increasingly popular entertainment market and recently developed economy.

Lastly, the article discusses that one of the reasons why Korean pop groups may be overtaking the popularity of Japanese pop groups is due to many groups' inclusion of foreign members, usually from Southeast Asia or East Asia, along with North Americans of Korean descent. It mentions the fact that there are Japanese groups in Southeast Asian countries, citing the "cloning of AKB48," which has given rise to JKT48 in Indonesia, BNK48 in Thailand, MNL48 in the Philippines, and SGO48 in Vietnam. Since these groups are entirely made up of members from these countries, however, I feel that these groups are very prone to losing their statuses of "Japanese groups" in many people's minds. Thus, it is almost as if the Japanese music industry is helping to expand the pop music scenes in Southeast Asia (and obviously has some control over them), but the groups themselves are purely Southeast Asian, with Japan in the end fumbling an opportunity for it to project its pop cultural influence into the region.

This, however, reminded me about a K-Pop group I had heard of prior to this class called EXP Edition, who has received criticism both in and out of Korea amongst K-Pop fans for being a group of four American men with the tagline, "born in New York, made in Seoul." The group's members are "Croatian Sime Kosta, Portuguese-American Frankie DaPonte from Rhode Island, half Japanese-German Koki Tomlinson who grew up in Texas, and New Yorker Hunter Kohl." Prior to moving to Seoul, none of them spoke Korean or had listened to much K-Pop. This has led fans to be quite divided between those who see this as an opportunity for K-Pop to gain more ground in Western markets and for Westerners to be more included in Korean society (something Korea already has Japan beat out on in many ways) and those who see this as disrespectful and/or threatening to K-Pop and Korean culture and society, more broadly.

Supplemental sources:
https://kyotoreview.org/issue-11/korean-wave-in-southeast-asia/
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-46381997
https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/news/exp-edition-feel-like-this-video-kpop-group-american-south-korea-bora-kim-art-project-a7688286.html

K-pop's increasing POPularity: J pop goes flat as Southeast Asia swoons for Korean artists


This article discusses the increasing popularity of Korean-pop stars and the influence K-pop has on South Eastern countries. In contrast, the popularity of J-pop stars is decreasing. Many brands are using K-pop stars as the faces of their companies in order to gain attraction and gain customers. The article emphasizes that the popularity of Korean pop-stars in Southeast Asian countries has brought familiarity of South Korean culture to these Southeast Asian countries. This familiarity with the K-pop stars has paved a way for increased government interaction between South Korea and these Southeast Asian countries. It is clear that “the interest in K-pop and other aspects of Korean culture may be helping South Korean President Moon Jae-in promote his New Southern Policy designed to increase his country’s visibility and influence in the region…[Indonesia] felt no burden in accepting Korean investment in strategic sectors like transportation, and even in defense.” The New Southern Policy aims to “strengthen ties with the developing countries in the southern hemisphere that are considered the economic growth engine” (https://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/1797204/embedding-s-korea-in-southeast-asia.) In Asia, “J-pop stars are almost nonexistent in the media, their places taken by K-pop idols whose faces are flooding billboards, TV commercials and the internet.” The article also touches on the fact that most J-pop groups are not on social media and do not own their own YouTube channels, only recently did one of the most popular J-pop groups create an Instagram account and YouTube channel. In contrast, nearly every American singer, rapper, music group, and other artists have their own YouTube channel and Instagram account. The article also discussed how K-pop groups sometimes will have members who are not Korean in the group. K-pop’s “global success may lie in its inclusiveness.” For example, “Blackpink includes a Thai member named Lisa. Another all-female group, (G)I-DLE, has members from Thailand, China and Taiwan while boy band GOT7 includes members from Thailand, Taiwan and Hong Kong.” It is common in the United States to have music groups and artists who come from diverse backgrounds, well because, the United States is so diverse to begin with. However, it is a strategic move by K-pop groups to include members who are non-Korean because it is inclusive and allows room for popularity in other countries, especially if members of K-pop groups come from other countries besides Korea. 

skool rulez :(


Japanese school boards are rethinking strict school rules that were put in place in the 1980s to prevent delinquency in junior high and high school students. These rules encourage students to be disciplined and classes to be “as disciplined as possible.” However, some of these rules, such as requirements for certain colored underwear, appear to violate basic human rights. Spurred by the case in which an 18-year-old girl sued Osaka Prefecture after her teachers forced her to dyed her naturally brown hair black, some municipalities have moved to loosen the strictness of school rules.

One of the major points that the news article featured was the fact that male teachers would be able to look up school girls’ skirts in order to check the color of their underwear to see if they are in accordance with school rules—which is, how to say, sexual harassment. Masayuki Ishigami, the education board official quoted in the article, said, “at the very least, we felt it necessary to revise those school rules that affect students’ human rights.” However, Ishigami only mentioned the underwear color rule in reference to human rights and not rules such as prohibiting students from wearing scarves and tights in the winter despite the cold.

Some other rules not shown in the article also seem arbitrary rather than actively preventing a problem. For example, students are able to wear V-neck sweaters but not cardigans. The same applies for the aforementioned rule of no scarves and tights—while there may be some reason for these rules, such as the conformity argument mentioned in the article, the sweater vs. cardigan rule seems particularly arbitrary. The rule against no scarves and tights seems like some sort of human rights violation, especially considering the cold weather that many students have to walk or bike through to get to the bus or the train or other forms of transportation.  

According to the community piece “School rules in Japan offer harsh lessons in mindless assimilation” by Colin P.A. Jones published by the Japan Times, the strict school rules of Japanese schools sometimes drive students to truancy or to suicide. This, Jones claims, is caused by the harassment (called “guidance”) from teachers towards “nonconformists.” Similar to the article discussed two weeks previously on school bullying, school students sometimes take leaves of absences or are truant—however, in this case, the harassment comes from the teachers of the school and the school itself rather than other students.

Another Japan Times article (“Osaka surveys schools over hair-color rules after lawsuit,” Mizuho Aoki) notes that the strict regulations eased in the 1990s when more teachers tried to guide students by “developing trusted relationships.” However, this trend ended when many failed to gain the trust of students, putting strict regulations back in place.

Additional sources

First post of the decade!

hi mina-san, hope you are all doing well i often think about how news shapes japan today.